Texas A&M
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
173  Kelsie Warren SO 20:12
244  Ashley Driscoll SO 20:23
655  Kelsey Persyn SR 21:04
839  Ashton Hutcherson SO 21:18
964  Lauryn Barrientos SO 21:26
1,015  Kaitlin Tanner JR 21:29
1,031  Hannah Campbell JR 21:30
1,348  Devin Norton SR 21:51
1,361  Lizette Chapa JR 21:52
1,376  Olivia Arriaza SO 21:52
1,788  Maddie Vondra FR 22:19
National Rank #75 of 348
South Central Region Rank #6 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 2.7%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 63.8%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kelsie Warren Ashley Driscoll Kelsey Persyn Ashton Hutcherson Lauryn Barrientos Kaitlin Tanner Hannah Campbell Devin Norton Lizette Chapa Olivia Arriaza Maddie Vondra
Bulldog SEC Preview 09/09 1082 20:33 21:13 21:12 21:21 21:10 21:31 21:46 21:52 22:20
Texas A&M Invitational 09/23 951 20:27 20:15 21:09 21:25 21:14 21:16 21:47 21:39 21:34
Aggieland Open 10/06 1243 21:37 21:45 21:42
Crimson Classic 10/13 851 19:57 20:12 20:50 21:19 21:41 21:59 21:49 22:43 21:42 22:01 22:43
SEC Championship 10/27 815 19:51 20:09 20:55 21:04 21:24 21:21 22:12 21:57 22:09 22:28
South Region Championships 11/10 1066 20:26 21:04 21:19 21:16 21:23 21:41





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 2.7% 29.9 745 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.6 1.3
Region Championship 100% 5.0 166 2.7 9.3 17.1 34.8 33.9 2.1 0.1 0.2



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kelsie Warren 22.2% 118.0
Ashley Driscoll 6.8% 133.5
Kelsey Persyn 2.7% 217.0
Ashton Hutcherson 2.7% 236.0
Lauryn Barrientos 2.7% 241.7
Kaitlin Tanner 2.7% 242.4
Hannah Campbell 2.7% 242.4


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kelsie Warren 13.2 0.4 0.9 1.3 2.6 2.5 3.3 3.6 3.2 4.5 5.5 6.3 6.7 8.2 7.8 7.1 8.6 6.8 5.0 3.7 3.4 3.0 1.9 1.4 0.7 0.7
Ashley Driscoll 17.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.9 1.1 1.6 1.7 2.3 2.7 3.6 4.2 5.0 6.9 7.9 9.0 9.2 8.1 5.9 4.8 4.6 4.3 2.9 2.6
Kelsey Persyn 37.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.8
Ashton Hutcherson 47.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5
Lauryn Barrientos 53.5 0.2 0.1 0.2
Kaitlin Tanner 56.9 0.1
Hannah Campbell 57.6 0.1 0.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2.7% 100.0% 2.7 2.7 2
3 9.3% 9.3 3
4 17.1% 17.1 4
5 34.8% 34.8 5
6 33.9% 33.9 6
7 2.1% 2.1 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.2% 0.2 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 2.7% 2.7 97.3 2.7 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0